Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules [Updated 12/21/2016]

MAIN RULES OF THE FORUMS

Please respect your community. Respect each other as you all enjoy the same thing – The Game.

We encourage open and friendly discussion of the game and the Community. Moderators and Staff have final decisions on all matters, and are here to make sure that the Community remains a friendly, fun place appropriate for players of all backgrounds, ages and groups.

It is the forum member's responsibility to stay up to date on forum rules and to honor the behavior outlined.

PURPOSE OF THE FORUMS

These forums provide an area for constructive player discussions of the game. It also allows players to
help each other identify bugs and issues, and help each other reproduce and resolve them.

These forums are not the most direct way to contact support. If you’re having an issue with your game and you need direct assistance, please tap on the FAQ/Support tab within the game.

CHANGES OR IMPROVEMENT

Please make sure to stay updated on these rules by reviewing this page from time to time.

SET RULES

This is a private board. As such, decisions made are final.
We reserve the right to remove any message board content without notice for any reason.


Rule 1: Responses to rule violations
Violating these rules will result in warnings, either formal or informal, suspensions, banning, or other sanctions.

Rule 2: Respect other users on the forums
- Do not make attacks or insult other users, either in the forums or through private messages. Disagreements and debates are fine, but don’t make it personal.
- Do not attack groups. This includes professions, races, religions, sexual orientations, genders, incomes, or even vague groups like “you people.”
- Do not use ill terms which are offensive to groups, do not “flame”, “troll.” or “haze”.

Rule 3: Respect the forum purpose and structure
- Make your posts in the appropriate forum.
- Please use the Search function. If a relevant thread already exists, please post there instead of creating a new thread about the same topic. Duplicate threads will be closed to keep the forums orderly and easy to navigate.
- Keep off-topic posts in the off-topic forum.
- Don’t start discussions about games that are not ours.
- Do not cross-link to other message boards or websites unless approved by a moderator.

Rule 4: Respect the law
- Do not post anything illegal under U.S. law, or encourage other users to break the laws of the U.S. or their country of residence.
- Do not encourage users to break terms of service. This includes giving information about how to find scripts, exploits, or cheats, as well as arranging to buy or sell accounts or virtual goods.

Rule 5: Respect the audience
Think about who you're talking to. Users may be as young as 13 on these message boards, and may be male or female, and from countries across the globe.
- Keep your language civil. Profanity is frowned on.
- Do not post Adult Material, inappropriate graphic sexual content in any format, or links to sexually explicit sites.
- Do not post graphic images or explicit descriptions of violent acts.
- Do not use an avatar or signature that could offend other users. They have to look at it a lot.

Rule 6: Respect privacy
- Do not post any private emails or private messages unless you have the explicit permission of each person involved in the exchange.
- Do not post private communication between customer support, members, moderators, or administrators on these forums, or anywhere else. (This include support ticket responses)
- Do not post any information covered by a non-disclosure agreement or beta testing agreement. Even if you somehow have inside information about our competitors, for legal reasons we don’t want to hear it.
- Do not post Facebook information about other forum users.
- Do not post any private information about other users.
- Do not post in-game information in an attempt to have other players attack your target. Be careful to not cross the line into bullying.

Rule 7: Do not spam
- Do not post repeatedly about the same topic.
- Do not spam users on the forums or through private messages.
- Do not start a thread without actual purpose.
- Do not start a thread about a news story or article unless you make it clear what the story is about, and offer your own opinion to start a discussion.

Rule 8: Respect your account
- Do not share your account information with other individuals. You will be held responsible for any rules violations that occur under your account.
- Do not create new accounts or use other tricks to avoid suspensions or bans.
- Do not create ‘sock puppet’ accounts – multiple accounts created just so that you can agree with yourself and make it seem like your ideas have more support than they do.
- Never include your e-mail address or any other personal information in posts.

Rule 9: Respect the Moderators
- Do not post using the color red. This color is reserved for moderators.
- Do not impersonate moderators. Do not claim to speak for the moderators.

Rule 10: Respect the decisions of the moderators
- The moderation teams reserves the right to warn, suspend, or permanently ban users judged to be acting against the spirit of the rules, even if the user is following the letter of the rules.
- Do not argue with moderators about moderator decisions. You can disagree with a moderator’s opinions, just like any other poster, but when they post moderator actions in red text, it is considered final.
- Moderators have no access to your game account. If you have an issue you must contact customer service.

Generally, BE NICE. There is nothing wrong with being nice to each other.
See more
See less

Defusionizers (2)

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Defusionizers (2)

    I'm not entirely certain that devs are gonna respond to the future of defusionizers in the thread that got closed.

    I'm opening this one so player base can keep on evaluating the need or no need of defusionizers in game.

    Kindest Regards Ramaria 🌺

  • #2
    Re: Defusionizers (2)

    Duke,

    Can we get a response on this thread? This topic has been discussed ad nauseum here without any ofiicial comments from Gaea...Does Gaea intend to introduce this feature or not? Please advise.

    Very truly yours,
    ⚡️Alpha⚡️

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Defusionizers (2)

      Will provide a few opportunities in next event.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Defusionizers (2)

        Originally posted by UWE_Duke View Post
        Will provide a few opportunities in next event.
        Sounds very promising

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Defusionizers (2)

          Lol wow. Thats all im going to say.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Defusionizers (2)

            Originally posted by Irish View Post
            Lol wow. Thats all im going to say.
            Does make u curious right

            Cant wait to see devs take on it. I've been waiting a long time for this

            Edit: I checked when I started previous thread and it was in Feb. Thats not so long after all lol. Think it feels longer since the matter didnt get an official respons until yesterday.
            Last edited by Ramaria2; 10-31-2017, 09:00 AM.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Defusionizers (2)

              This is great news. I hope this means “a few opportunities” per toon and not for the whole UE community as a whole. Limiting the ability to the top 3 or top 10 would be demoralizing for the vast majority of players. Please make the ability available to the community as a whole in a way that is attainable. P.S. thank you Duke for the communication and taking our suggestions seriously!

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Defusionizers (2)

                I just fused away 2 Lt's and I noticed that the warning it gives appears to have changed.
                I swear it used to warn you that the process cannot be reversed or that it said something like "Are you sure you want to do this?"
                It no longer warns you other than that the fused Lt's will be consumed.
                Am I wrong? Has the warning changed?
                If defusing a Lt is soon to be allowed, it makes the warning that existed for years meaningless.
                I am not sure I agree with this.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Defusionizers (2)

                  Originally posted by UWE_Duke View Post
                  Will provide a few opportunities in next event.
                  Duke,

                  Gentle reminder...Where is promised un-combinerfunction for MMB event?

                  Very truly yours,

                  ⚡️Alpha⚡️

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Defusionizers (2)

                    Hi

                    First I want to apologise if this post is anything but polite. If so its just my inner frustration of the matter showing. In return I will forgive the unlogical and passive aggressive answer by devs in an other thread. I will do so because I understand the work load that they must be under during event.

                    .....

                    I understand that this is a game that needs to render income by people spending money.

                    What I dont get is why devs cant see defusionizers as a way to do this? There are plenty of suggestions in old thread upon how to achieve this.

                    If devs only give this opportunity to the very big spenders then they will piss a lot of people off. Why? Because they will feel that they are looked upon as being of lesser value to the community.

                    Try playing ue with only 10 people in it.

                    In my opinion the option to defuse a lieutenant after event should have been given out to no less then rank 4500 and up.

                    More so I think that giving it out as a support solution shows that the intent with doing so was to please Alpha and not the player base. Pleasing Alpha was not the intent with my initial thread start (no offence Alpha lol )

                    So, if the devs has no intention of putting defusionizers in game then I would like to be told so and why. Though old thread was started in feb there was no input at all from devs regarding the matter until dev mentioned it as a reward during event.

                    I want the feedback from devs because as long as I dont get one I cant see the big downside with implementing it. And stubborn and patientas I am I then will keep up with trying to find a solution.

                    Kindest Regards 🌺

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Defusionizers (2)

                      Originally posted by Ramaria2 View Post
                      Hi

                      First I want to apologise if this post is anything but polite. If so its just my inner frustration of the matter showing. In return I will forgive the unlogical and passive aggressive answer by devs in an other thread. I will do so because I understand the work load that they must be under during event.

                      .....

                      I understand that this is a game that needs to render income by people spending money.

                      What I dont get is why devs cant see defusionizers as a way to do this? There are plenty of suggestions in old thread upon how to achieve this.

                      If devs only give this opportunity to the very big spenders then they will piss a lot of people off. Why? Because they will feel that they are looked upon as being of lesser value to the community.

                      Try playing ue with only 10 people in it.

                      In my opinion the option to defuse a lieutenant after event should have been given out to no less then rank 4500 and up.

                      More so I think that giving it out as a support solution shows that the intent with doing so was to please Alpha and not the player base. Pleasing Alpha was not the intent with my initial thread start (no offence Alpha lol )

                      So, if the devs has no intention of putting defusionizers in game then I would like to be told so and why. Though old thread was started in feb there was no input at all from devs regarding the matter until dev mentioned it as a reward during event.

                      I want the feedback from devs because as long as I dont get one I cant see the big downside with implementing it. And stubborn and patientas I am I then will keep up with trying to find a solution.

                      Kindest Regards ��
                      I agree that the way to get defusionizers at the moment is not what most expected and i hope Duke revisits this and finds a way for all the player base to get it (even if it's a one time option in a players lifespan so as not to make GAEA lose money if that's the issue). Duke responded to a non-friendly post as best he could in another thread.

                      If we want something we need to reason with the developers and implore them to give it us while explaining the need for it. Bashing or attacking Devs as some choose to do won't result in anything productive.

                      You have stated sound reasons and are constructive on your posts (which is the right way to go) about why we need this feature so lets hope Duke and Gaea can help all of the player base attain it one way or the other as soon as possible.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Defusionizers (2)

                        Originally posted by chelsea View Post
                        I agree that the way to get defusionizers at the moment is not what most expected and i hope Duke revisits this and finds a way for all the player base to get it (even if it's a one time option in a players lifespan so as not to make GAEA lose money if that's the issue). Duke responded to a non-friendly post as best he could in another thread.

                        If we want something we need to reason with the developers and implore them to give it us while explaining the need for it. Bashing or attacking Devs as some choose to do won't result in anything productive.

                        You have stated sound reasons and are constructive on your posts (which is the right way to go) about why we need this feature so lets hope Duke and Gaea can help all of the player base attain it one way or the other as soon as possible.
                        If one person complaining in a not so nice way causes the devs to scrap a feature, then we have bigger problems.

                        He could have easily just not responded.

                        Anyways, i hope he meant that the current process won’t be used in the future. People wanted the feature and maybe they just put the support option in as a way to get the ball rolling.

                        As one of the more critical voices on the forum, I’ve been impressed with Gaea’s year of progress. Don’t stop moving forward with the community requests.

                        Some of the best features in the game came from these boards.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Defusionizers (2)

                          wasn't this whole idea born out of a player making a mistake and making two 9 stars of the same Lt? If so really they should at the very least allow it so if a player does that by mistake then they could undo it, no one loses any money or even better make it so its impossible to make identical 9 star Lts.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Defusionizers (2)

                            Originally posted by mr_teflon View Post
                            wasn't this whole idea born out of a player making a mistake and making two 9 stars of the same Lt? If so really they should at the very least allow it so if a player does that by mistake then they could undo it, no one loses any money or even better make it so its impossible to make identical 9 star Lts.
                            Hi

                            I was the creator of original old thread and it was not due to have 9* two of the same lts. But, the player who did, did so by mistake, a mistake that game doesn't prevent. There is no pop up showing "u already have a 9* john and cant seat both". Since game allows u to star up the same lt (to 9*) a second time u should either be allowed to seat that second identical 9* or game should prevent u from being able to fuse/combine one.

                            But, the value of a defusionizer is another. Its to prevent players from bunkering up uncombined lts. The constant game changes and the counter lts make older lts outdated. Since starring up is expensive and the fear of betting onthe wrong horse will make people reluctant to take chance on starring them up, revenue will decrease. A defusionizer would be a way to take away that fear.

                            And depending on how devs would implement it in game, they could also make somemoney out of the defusionizers themselves.

                            I really dont see why devs wouldnt wanna implement them

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Defusionizers (2)

                              Originally posted by Ramaria2 View Post
                              There is no pop up showing "u already have a 9* john and cant seat both". Since game allows u to star up the same lt (to 9*) a second time u should either be allowed to seat that second identical 9* or game should prevent u from being able to fuse/combine one.
                              Both of these are actually very good ideas.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X